Categories: Tech & Society

U.S. Court Denies MegaUpload Request For Dismissal


MegaUpload has been on a winning streak in court, but last week a U.S. district judge denied the company’s request to dismiss a criminal indictment against it.

The U.S. Attorney’s office has accused MegaUpload and its leaders of operating the cloud-storage service as a criminal enterprise. U.S. officials allege that founder Kim DotCom and six other associates encouraged users to upload pirated movies, music, and other media to MegaUpload’s lockers so managers could get rich on advertising revenue and premium subscription fees.

MegaUpload’s lawyers asked the court to throw out the indictment against the company arguing that MegaUpload wasn’t a U.S. company and because it had no address here, it could not be served a criminal summons. But the judge rejected that argument, saying that the lack of a U.S. address under criminal law “does not require a result so extreme as dismissal” of an indictment.

The Motion Picture Association of America issued this statement: “Given the major role that Megaupload Limited played in the theft of innovation and creativity from hardworking creators and makers, we’re pleased that the criminal case against it will proceed here in the U.S.”

I’ve asked for a comment from MegaUpload’s attorneys and will update as soon as I hear back.

The case against MegaUpload and its managers is one of the rare criminal copyright cases brought against a company that claims to be protected by the safe harbor provision in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). Provided that Internet service providers follow the rules set down by the DMCA, they are supposed to be protected from liability for the copyright violations committed by users.

MegaUpload had millions of followers across the globe and the United States claims that the cost to copyright owners from lost sales was in the hundreds of millions of dollars.

The judge’s decision means that the case against the company will continue. The charges against DotCom and the individual defendants were not at issue in this decision.

Via: CNet

Team TechPanda

Recent Posts

The death of paper records: Will AI-driven EHRs eliminate medical errors?

Patient records have long been a collection of handwritten notes, prescription slips, and test results,…

2 days ago

The future of contactless hospitality: Balancing convenience with personalization

The fast pace development of the hospitality industry will result in contactless technology adoption, where…

4 days ago

AI & automation in Indian digital marketing: A game-changer for ROI

In the ever-evolving world of digital marketing, a powerful shift is quietly transforming the way…

4 days ago

Open Innovation Thrives on Chaos Collaboration and Unexpected Creativity

Philosophical at its core, open innovation is a socio-economic movement synonymous with globalization and decentralization…

4 days ago

Striking a balance between digital independence & online safety for kids

Parenting is never an easy task. Ask any parent today about the biggest challenge, and…

5 days ago

Why everything is a subscription now & what it means for your wallet

In the last decade, purchasing and accessing products and services have undergone a radical transformation.…

1 week ago